Salomon Womens Outline Shoe Trellis Reflecting Pond Reviews

Salomon'south hiking lineup is undoubtedly all-encompassing, running the gamut from robust backpacking-ready boots for mileage-heavy objectives to light and responsive low-top offerings for mean solar day hiking. The OUTline Depression GTX falls in the latter category, combining an impressively low weight and responsive feel with fantabulous grip for navigating variable terrain. I brought the women's model to Patagonia for testing and came abroad impressed by how it handled 100+ miles of hiking and backpacking. It's not the most comfortable or supportive option for covering long distances with a total pack, but the confidence-inspiring traction, sleek and modern styling, and agile experience are undeniable highlights for most light to moderate trail use. Beneath I break down my experiences with the OUTline. To see how it stacks upward to the competition, run into our article on the best women's hiking shoes.

---

Table of Contents

• Comfort
• Weight
• Traction
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Build Quality and Durability
• Fit and Sizing
• What We Like/What We Don't
• Comparison Table
• The Contest

---

Performance

Condolement

Putting on the Salomon OUTline Low GTX for the offset time, I was immediately struck by its comfortable and flexible experience—more reminiscent of a running shoe than a low-top hiker. Out of the box, I wore the shoes for 36 hours of travel from Colorado to Patagonia and afterwards hit the trail for multiple days of hiking and backpacking, including a three-nighttime stint in the Rio Eléctrico valley. The OUTline has a noticeably able-bodied, soft, sneaker-like feel that promoted excellent responsiveness and agility, and the cushioning—while not particularly thick or padded—was a good match whether I was walking through the drome or moving rapidly on well-maintained trails. Even on longer days of upwardly to 10 miles with a total 55-liter pack, I suffered no soreness or achiness. And a terminal highlight worth calling out is the sleek and modern pattern: More than than virtually hiking shoes, the OUTline looks the role for wearing casually (1 colleague immediately complimented the shoe's classy looks when nosotros met upwardly at the airdrome).

That said, I did notice a drop in comfort on longer objectives under the full weight of a pack. This was especially credible while navigating the steep pass down to Lago Eléctrico, which involved hiking over precipitous rocks and bedrock-hopping to our campsite at the end of the lake. By the fourth dimension we reached campsite, my feet were tired and conspicuously feeling the impacts of the trail. All in all, it's articulate that you practice merchandise some cushion, protection, and back up for the lightweight and responsive ride, but the OUTline can hands get the chore done for curt to moderate day hikes and even lite backpacking missions. If you anticipate covering more technical ground with a full pack, withal, y'all may want to upgrade to a more than cushioned (simply less sprightly) model like Salomon's own X Ultra 4.

Weight

Given its running shoe-similar styling and build, it's not too surprising that the Salomon OUTline Depression GTX checks in at a scant ane pound 4.v ounces for the women'southward pair. For reference, it undercuts other popular low-elevation hikers including Salomon's X Ultra 4 GTX (one lb. 11.5 oz.), Cantankerous Hike GTX (1 lb. 6.9 oz.), and Danner's Trail 2650 GTX (ane lb. 5 oz.). You tin go a little lighter with options like Salomon'southward Vaya GTX (ane lb. 3.eight oz.) or Hoka One One's trail running-focused Speedgoat iv (1 lb. 2.4 oz.), merely y'all can look sacrifices in both support and durability (and the Hoka isn't waterproof). All in all, I consider the OUTline's weight to exist perfectly reasonable given its intentions and barely noticed the shoes on the trail, which says a lot nearly its lightweight and flexible feel. If you lot prefer added stability or support, however, you lot may want to footstep up to a slightly heavier design like those mentioned above.

Traction

Similar to our experiences with the men's shoe and boot, the women's OUTline Low GTX was a real standout in the traction department. In terms of structure, the in-house Contagrip outsole boasts relatively deep and generously spaced 5-millimeter lugs that provided excellent grip on everything from shine trail to boulders and wet rocks in stream crossings. The only fourth dimension I noticed any slippage was during a steep and backbreaking descent of Paso Huemul, where an extended rainstorm left thick sections of mud that were treacherous to navigate. That said, my partner was wearing an fifty-fifty more aggressive Salomon trail runner with deeper tread and fared similarly, sliding down the slope on occasion. But otherwise, the OUTline was incredibly confidence-inspiring and easily got the job done on multiple day hikes and more demanding backpacking objectives, even during periods of bushwhacking and off-trail travel.

Stability and Back up

As I mentioned higher up, the Salomon OUTline feels a lot like a running shoe, so information technology came as trivial surprise that it prioritizes a flexible and responsive ride over all-out support. To be off-white, I didn't suffer any ankle rolls on the trail (which I've been prone to in the past), but the shoes did feel a lilliputian clumsy on rougher and more technical terrain, specially when I was carrying a full 55-liter backpacking pack. This was particularly noticeable around the collar expanse, where my ankles had a good amount of room to move around. The laces were likewise decumbent to loosening and coming untied if they weren't double-knotted, which only added to the sloppy feeling (I embrace this more in the "Fit and Sizing" section below).

In the cease, yet, the OUTline performed better than expected: Despite racking up well over 100 miles in my commencement 2 weeks with the shoes—including two multi-solar day backpacking trips that included a good corporeality of off-trail travel—I experienced no major stability-related bug. Information technology did take some endeavour to precisely place my feet as I grew tired toward the cease of each twenty-four hour period, but I appreciated the power to vesture them back-to-back for backpacking and light trail runs. Even so, if your primary objective is shuttling a heavy pack or roofing longer distances, I'd recommend stepping up to a design with a wider and more stable base of operations like Salomon's own X Ultra 4.

Waterproofing

I tested the waterproof version of the Salomon OUTline Low, which comes equipped with a premium Gore-Tex membrane to seal out moisture. The shoes performed as expected: They kept my anxiety dry during shallow stream crossings and in lite pelting, but as soon as I stepped into deeper water, it poured over the collar and saturated my socks. The shoes also became soaked fairly apace during a 2-twenty-four hour period stint of rain that I encountered on the Huemul Circuit. And one time wet, the shoes took a long fourth dimension to dry, especially in humid weather. Even when I left them in my tent vestibule to dry overnight, they were even so noticeably soggy in the morning time. To be fair, this is a known downside to waterproof footwear, and I'd recommend opting for the non-waterproof variation ($110) if y'all look to encounter deeper water crossings or extended periods of rain.

Breathability

Waterproofing and breathability are often at odds, but I plant that the Salomon OUTline Low GTX breathed relatively well given its Gore-Tex construction. The synthetic upper has a good amount of mesh forth the forefoot and sides, which provided decent ventilation and airflow. For reference, I didn't experience any noticeable swampiness or sweatiness in the shoes during testing, although they did take a long time to dry out one time they were soaked from h2o crossings and extended exposure to moisture. If breathability is a top priority or if y'all want a quicker-drying alternative, I'd advise saving with the not-waterproof version of the shoes.

Build Quality and Immovability

Salomon is a leader in the backpacking and hiking shoe markets, and the OUTline is yet another well-made pattern. Equally I touched on previously, the Contagrip outsole is very grippy and has deftly withstood miles of hiking and backpacking with no wearing downwards, the Gore-Tex membrane has been constructive at sealing out water and moisture, and everything from the laces to the mesh-heavy synthetic upper are belongings up well with no notable signs of wear. Our male testers did experience the rubber toe cap peeling away after only a unmarried hike, only my women'southward pair has proven to be much more hardwearing than expected. That said, information technology'southward of import not to confuse the running-inspired OUTline with a serious and more rugged backpacking-fix pattern. If y'all anticipate doing a lot of off-trail hiking or conveying a heavy pack, it may be worth upgrading to a more robust and thicker model like the 10 Ultra four or Salomon'due south meridian-end Quest four Gore-Tex Hiking Boots.

Fit and Sizing

Salomon shoes tend to run on the narrower end, but my standard women'southward size viii.5 was a near-perfect fit right out of the box. For reference, I have relatively boilerplate feet (I wouldn't classify them as particularly narrow or broad), and the shoes hugged my anxiety nicely with no noticeable areas of tightness or looseness. That said, it'south worth noting that a couple of our male testers found the shoes to be slightly snug at the midfoot and toe box, and so I'd recommend trying them on before buying. And if you take higher-book feet, Salomon does offer the depression-superlative OUTline in defended wide models for the same price.

My only fit-related gripe is that the laces were prone to coming untied and loosening, fifty-fifty when double-knotted. I imagine this has to do with the shape of the laces, which are flat to reduce pressure points over the instep. In exercise, I suffered no bug with hotspots or rubbing and expected that the grippy material would concur firm and keep them in place, merely the laces speedily came untied whatsoever time I didn't double-knot them. Even when snugged tightly and doubled back, they nonetheless loosened subsequently long days on the trail. To exist off-white, re-adjusting them was easy and quick, but it did take some patience and prevention to proceed them snug and secure.

Other Versions of the Salomon OUTline

In improver to the women'due south Low GTX version tested here, Salomon offers a few other variations in the OUTline collection. On the women'due south side, these include a non-waterproof low-top alternative that retails for $110, also as a mid-elevation Gore-Tex boot for $150. The men's collection is largely similar, including availability in waterproof and not-waterproof low-top options and a mid-meridian boot with Gore-Tex. The men's OUTline Low GTX weighs a picayune more than the women's version tested here at 1 pound 8.7 ounces per pair and is offered in different colorways, but the overall construction and feature set are largely identical (y'all tin run into our in-depth review of the men's model here). Equally I covered above, the OUTline Low is too sold in dedicated wide models for those with college-volume feet.

What We Like

• Given its running shoe-like build and flexibility, the OUTline has entreatment for everything from long day hikes and light backpacking to shorter trail runs.
• Incredibly light at just 1 pound 4.v ounces for the pair with a noticeably responsive and agile feel to match.
• Confidence-inspiring grip on everything from well-maintained paths to wet rocks and logs.
• Sleek and modern styling gives the shoes added entreatment for around-town and coincidental vesture.
• Prissy diversity of sizes and styles, including a not-waterproof variation, mid-height kicking, and dedicated broad sizes.

What We Don't

• Limited support and stability (specially at the ankles) for covering longer distances under the weight of a full pack.
• The laces are prone to coming untied, and you'll need to double-knot them tightly to stay in place.
• Comfort started to suffer on technical terrain, where my anxiety grew noticeably tired and felt the impacts of the trail after long days of hiking.
• The thinner and mesh-heavy build is more prone to abrasion and wear than thicker and more hardwearing designs similar the Ten Ultra 4 (although the shoes have held up well for me thus far).

Comparison Table

Shoe	Price	Category	Weight	Waterproof	Upper
Salomon OUTline Depression GTX	$130	Hiking shoe	1 lb. iv.5 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Constructed
Salomon X Ultra four GTX	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 11.5 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Salomon Cross Hike GTX	$160	Hiking shoe	ane lb. 6.9 oz.	Aye (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Salomon Vaya Depression GTX	$140	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 3.8 oz.	Yeah (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Danner Trail 2650 GTX	$190	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 5 oz.	Yeah (Gore-Tex)	Leather / textile
Hoka One One Speedgoat 4	$145	Trail runner	1 lb. 2.iv oz.	No (available)	Mesh

The Competition

The Salomon OUTline Low GTX checks many of the boxes we await for in a quality low-top hiking shoe: Information technology's responsive, highly grippy, and a nice match for everything from moderate mean solar day hikes to easy backpacking missions. That said, y'all can certainly become more stability in this category, and Salomon'south own 10 Ultra 4 GTX fits that bill nicely. In brusque, the X Ultra 4 is heavier than the OUTline at ane pound 11.5 ounces for the women'southward pair, but for the added weight, you get noticeable upgrades in cushioning, protection, and support. Information technology does cost $20 more for the GTX version and lacks the sleek, urban wait of the OUTline, but nosotros consider it to be the more well-rounded, trail-ready design (specially if you plan to add backpacking to the mix).

Another popular Salomon design to have on your radar is the Cross Hike GTX, which shares the sprightly and running shoe-like feel of the OUTline. At i pound 6.9 ounces, information technology stacks up fairly competitively in terms of weight and shares many of the aforementioned features, including quality Gore-Tex waterproofing, Contagrip rubber, and a flexible construction. In parsing out the differences, the Cross Hike costs $xxx more at $160 but boasts Salomon's unmarried-pull Quicklace organization, has a slightly more than aggressive outsole, and provides a little more than cushioning underfoot. Neither pattern is ideal for shuttling a heavy pack over long distances, but the Cross Hike strikes us as a step up in all-around performance. If y'all only plan to solar day hike over easier terrain, however, information technology may exist worth saving with the OUTline.

A final in-house pick to consider is Salomon's Vaya GTX, which is part of their women's-specific collection and slots in every bit the lightest hiking-focused alternative here at a scant 1 pound 3.8 ounces. Like the OUTline, the Vaya has a very responsive and active feel with a SensiFlex synthetic upper that'south comfortable out of the box and designed to stretch to accommodate natural foot swelling. However, the wider shape feels a fleck sloppier and less aggressive than the OUTline (it has a "standard" fit compared to the OUTline's "slim" designation), and neither shoe is a standout in terms of cushioning or support for high-mileage days with a full pack. For $10 less, we consider the OUTline to be the slightly better value, but a concluding decision may come up downward to which shoe fits you better.

Outside of Salomon's lineup, Danner's Trail 2650 GTX is another well-fabricated and lightweight low-top hiker. Right off the bat, we'll note that the Danner is considerably pricier than the OUTline at $190, but it's no slouch in terms of performance. In terms of features, the Trail 2650 includes premium touches similar a Gore-Tex membrane, tacky Vibram outsole, and substantial rubber toe cap to fend off direct hits from rocks and roots. The partial-leather build is also noticeably more confidence-inspiring from a long-term durability standpoint, and Danner managed to keep weight impressively low at just 1 pound v ounces. In the finish, unless price is a deterrent, we consider the Danner to be the better-built and more loftier-functioning selection for everything from short day hikes to lightweight backpacking objectives.

For those aimed at traveling fast and light, our favorite ultralight option this season is Hoka I One's Speedgoat 4. Right away, it'due south of import to signal out that the Speedgoat is a true trail runner rather than a hiking shoe, but it's beloved amongst the thru-hiking community for its impressive durability and excellent cushioning at a very low (ane lb. two.iv oz.) weight. Like most of Hoka's designs, the Speedgoat boasts an ultra-thick midsole that provides great isolation from the trail, only information technology's still firm and supportive plenty to cover longer distances. Withal, compared to the OUTline and other low-tiptop hikers, the Speedgoat lacks protection and stability on uneven basis (especially when conveying a heavy pack), and you don't get waterproofing on the standard model (they do offer a Gore-Tex-equipped version for $160). All told, the Speedgoat is a viable option for the fast-and-light crowd and minimalist backpackers, merely the OUTline has wider appeal for most traditional hikers.

dickersonantoomp.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.switchbacktravel.com/reviews/salomon-outline-low-gtx-womens